ext_24232 ([identity profile] awanderingbard.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] awanderingbard 2014-07-27 06:43 pm (UTC)

Certainly!

For all three the brothers, the answers are largely the same: they would get violent to protect each other or someone they cared about, and would act heroic under the same circumstances.

For Mycroft, it's basically only Sherlock, Mummy, or Q who would ever induce him to violence in their protection. He very much prefers other methods, and would only attack if it were literally life and death, and would do it fast and effectively. In terms of heroism, he would act heroically if England was in danger. He also has quite a dislike of abusive spouses and parents, but would be more likely to quietly destroy their happiness than take direct action.

For Sherlock, John, Mrs Hudson, Mummy, Mary, and Lestrade all fall under those categories along with Mycroft and Q. He has no qualms hurting someone who is hurting someone else, or to protect himself. He dislikes bullies of all forms.

Q falls somewhere in between--he, like Mycroft, would rather find alternate means, but he does frequently carry a weapon and knows how to use it--and would, to protect his family or his 'minions' in Q-branch. He stayed online with an agent after Silva's bomb ripped out the MI-6 building, shooing everyone else out while he kept talking to the agent until the agent was clear.

Of the three brother, Q definitely is more inclined to stand his ground and make a solid choice in the name of doing the 'right' thing. Sherlock's acts of heroism are more dramatic and less effective. Mycroft's acts of heroism are sneaky, and not easily noticed or acknowledged.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting