awanderingbard: (Dresden: Harry magicking)
[personal profile] awanderingbard
Asking this on my f-list before I venture into Little Details, as I don't particularly know how to Google for this.

Does anyone know if a person who has been convicted of a crime has any right to see the evidence used against him? As is, lab reports, autopsy results, etc. And if those are available to him, would the names of people composing them be redacted, or does he have a right to know them, as well?

It's not terribly important what the answer is, as I can have him acquire the information by illegal means, but I just want to know whether I have to state that the means were illegal, or if I can just write it out as something available to that person.

This is in the UK, if that makes a difference.

Date: 2014-01-26 01:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] celtic-cherokee.livejournal.com
In the US, someone who is convicted would've had the opportunity to see the evidence beforehand in order to decide their plea. In the UK? I'd think that applied as well, but I'm not sure - this page might help: http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/a_to_c/confession_and_breaches_of_police_and_criminal_evidence_act/#Review

Date: 2014-01-26 03:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] awanderingbard.livejournal.com
Thank you! That's very useful!

Date: 2014-01-26 01:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] celtic-cherokee.livejournal.com
Commenting twice, because it said the first was spam... >_> Anyway, unspam me. :P

Profile

awanderingbard: (Default)
awanderingbard

April 2026

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 7th, 2026 05:37 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios